For Auditors

How to Get Funded as a
First Amendment Auditor.

You already know the law. You document violations cleanly. The financial gap between the violation and the settlement check is the only thing standing between you and doing this work at scale. That gap is what this model closes — with no cost to you unless the case settles.

The Gap

Between the violation and the check, you need to survive.

Camera held at eye level filming a public space near a government building

Civil rights settlements take 12 to 24 months from documented violation to check. Most auditors are not independently wealthy. Between those two facts sits the reason most auditors stop before they build a track record — not because the law failed them, but because the bills did not wait.

The model described at how the performance-only funding model works is designed to close this gap. An advance covers your operating costs while the case works its way through the legal process. When the case settles, the advance is recovered from proceeds first. You keep the remainder. If the case does not settle — you owe nothing.

The model also contributes to something larger. Documented settlements against the same department and officer over time produce the financial pressure that changes behavior at the institutional level. Why documented settlements change department behavior explains the mechanism in full.

What Qualifies You

Discipline is the filter. The incentive structure does the rest.

The performance-only structure handles quality control automatically. Auditors who escalate unnecessarily, do not know the law, or undermine their own claims on camera do not produce settlements. They do not survive the funding filter. What qualifies you is not your following, your political alignment, or your confidence level — it is your legal accuracy and professional conduct on camera, demonstrated over a track record of real encounters.

Demonstrated constitutional knowledge

You know what you can and cannot do under the First and Fourth Amendments. You cite the law accurately on camera. You do not overstate your rights, invent legal standards that do not exist, or make claims that a competent civil rights attorney will have to walk back in the complaint. Legal accuracy is the foundation of a settleable case.

Professional conduct on camera

You do not escalate. You do not antagonize beyond what the encounter itself requires. You do not engage in conduct that gives a defense attorney material to undermine your claim. You stay in your lane — documenting what is happening, not performing for an audience in a way that muddles the legal record. The camera documents both the violation and your response to it. Both matter.

A track record of clean, documented violations

Not a first-time auditor. Not aspirational. You have existing documented encounters that resulted in clear, unambiguous violations on camera — the kind a civil rights attorney looks at and says yes. The advance structure scales with your track record: smaller initial advances that grow as you demonstrate documented results in the field.

The Advance Structure

What the advance covers. How repayment works.

What the advance covers

Living expenses between violations and settlements. Equipment acquisition and maintenance — cameras, microphones, storage, replacement gear. Travel costs to deployment locations. Incidental costs that accumulate across an active auditing schedule. The advance exists to eliminate the financial gap that forces capable auditors to stop.

How repayment works

When the case settles, the advance is recovered first from settlement proceeds. The funding entity takes a negotiated percentage of the net remaining after advance recovery. You keep the remainder. The full structure — percentages, advance amounts, recovery terms — is documented before the advance is made. No ambiguity about who gets what when the check arrives.

If the case doesn't settle

Nothing flows from you to the funding entity. No repayment. No penalty. The performance-only structure means the funding entity's return is tied entirely to settlement outcomes. This aligns every incentive in the same direction: a clean, documented, settleable case that produces a check both parties benefit from.

How advances scale

The first advance is sized conservatively against an unproven track record. As you demonstrate documented settlements, advance amounts grow to reflect your established value as a funded auditor. Discipline over time is how the model selects for its best participants — and how it rewards them.

Ready to apply

Submit your auditor profile.

Tell us about your track record, your jurisdiction, and the kind of violations you have documented. We will review your profile and connect you with fund operators who are looking for auditors in your area.

Auditor Funding Questions

What auditors ask first.

Three things qualify you: demonstrated constitutional knowledge (you know the law and deploy it accurately on camera), professional conduct on camera (you do not escalate or act in ways that undermine your legal claim), and an existing track record of clean, documented violations. First-time auditors do not qualify — the model requires demonstrated results, not potential.

Living expenses between violations and settlements, equipment costs, and travel to deployment locations. The advance is designed to eliminate the financial gap that forces capable auditors to stop — covering the 12 to 24 months that typically separate a documented violation from a settlement check.

The advance is recovered first from settlement proceeds. The funding entity then takes a negotiated percentage of the remaining net. You keep what is left. The exact percentages are negotiated and documented before the advance is made — no ambiguity, no surprises when the check arrives. The structure is transparent from day one.

Nothing. You owe nothing to the funding entity. The performance-only structure means the funding entity's return depends entirely on a settlement being reached. If the case does not settle — for any reason — the funding entity absorbs the loss. This is the risk the funding entity accepts in exchange for its percentage of the proceeds when cases do settle.

No. You apply as an auditor. The funding entity and its attorney capital partners handle the legal and investment structure. Your role is to document violations cleanly and professionally. When a case moves toward filing, the funding entity coordinates with civil rights attorneys who take the case on contingency — your documented violations are the evidence they need to say yes.

If you want to understand your rights more deeply before your next deployment, Be My Own Attorney provides preparation tools for First Amendment auditors specifically.

Legal notice: Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice or creates an attorney-client relationship. The funding model described here requires qualified legal counsel to implement. If you are facing criminal charges related to auditing activity, consult a licensed criminal defense attorney. This site is a public information resource.