You already know the law. You document violations cleanly. The financial gap between the violation and the settlement check is the only thing standing between you and doing this work at scale. That gap is what this model closes — with no cost to you unless the case settles.
Civil rights settlements take 12 to 24 months from documented violation to check. Most auditors are not independently wealthy. Between those two facts sits the reason most auditors stop before they build a track record — not because the law failed them, but because the bills did not wait.
The model described at how the performance-only funding model works is designed to close this gap. An advance covers your operating costs while the case works its way through the legal process. When the case settles, the advance is recovered from proceeds first. You keep the remainder. If the case does not settle — you owe nothing.
The model also contributes to something larger. Documented settlements against the same department and officer over time produce the financial pressure that changes behavior at the institutional level. Why documented settlements change department behavior explains the mechanism in full.
The performance-only structure handles quality control automatically. Auditors who escalate unnecessarily, do not know the law, or undermine their own claims on camera do not produce settlements. They do not survive the funding filter. What qualifies you is not your following, your political alignment, or your confidence level — it is your legal accuracy and professional conduct on camera, demonstrated over a track record of real encounters.
You know what you can and cannot do under the First and Fourth Amendments. You cite the law accurately on camera. You do not overstate your rights, invent legal standards that do not exist, or make claims that a competent civil rights attorney will have to walk back in the complaint. Legal accuracy is the foundation of a settleable case.
You do not escalate. You do not antagonize beyond what the encounter itself requires. You do not engage in conduct that gives a defense attorney material to undermine your claim. You stay in your lane — documenting what is happening, not performing for an audience in a way that muddles the legal record. The camera documents both the violation and your response to it. Both matter.
Not a first-time auditor. Not aspirational. You have existing documented encounters that resulted in clear, unambiguous violations on camera — the kind a civil rights attorney looks at and says yes. The advance structure scales with your track record: smaller initial advances that grow as you demonstrate documented results in the field.
Living expenses between violations and settlements. Equipment acquisition and maintenance — cameras, microphones, storage, replacement gear. Travel costs to deployment locations. Incidental costs that accumulate across an active auditing schedule. The advance exists to eliminate the financial gap that forces capable auditors to stop.
When the case settles, the advance is recovered first from settlement proceeds. The funding entity takes a negotiated percentage of the net remaining after advance recovery. You keep the remainder. The full structure — percentages, advance amounts, recovery terms — is documented before the advance is made. No ambiguity about who gets what when the check arrives.
Nothing flows from you to the funding entity. No repayment. No penalty. The performance-only structure means the funding entity's return is tied entirely to settlement outcomes. This aligns every incentive in the same direction: a clean, documented, settleable case that produces a check both parties benefit from.
The first advance is sized conservatively against an unproven track record. As you demonstrate documented settlements, advance amounts grow to reflect your established value as a funded auditor. Discipline over time is how the model selects for its best participants — and how it rewards them.
Officers who feel challenged sometimes retaliate — false arrest, unlawful detention, manufactured charges. This is a known pattern, not an edge case. Your legal knowledge in the field is your primary protection, and that knowledge needs to extend past knowing your rights during an encounter to knowing what to do when charges follow.
Preparation before the encounter matters as much as the encounter itself. Be My Own Attorney provides preparation tools for pro se legal defense — document preparation, legal research tools, and encounter preparation built specifically for First Amendment auditors and anyone who needs to understand and exercise their rights in court, not just in the field.
If you are facing charges that arose from a documented audit, that documentation is also your evidence. The same camera that captured the constitutional violation captures the retaliation. A civil rights attorney reviewing a retaliatory arrest case starts with the footage — which is exactly what a funded auditor will have.
Some of the capital from the 10% tithe structure — described fully at the 10% tithe for complex civil rights cases — is specifically directed toward cases that are righteous but too complex for standard contingency representation. A retaliation case with contested facts and no clean video evidence is exactly the kind of case the tithe is designed to fund.
Tell us about your track record, your jurisdiction, and the kind of violations you have documented. We will review your profile and connect you with fund operators who are looking for auditors in your area.
Three things qualify you: demonstrated constitutional knowledge (you know the law and deploy it accurately on camera), professional conduct on camera (you do not escalate or act in ways that undermine your legal claim), and an existing track record of clean, documented violations. First-time auditors do not qualify — the model requires demonstrated results, not potential.
Living expenses between violations and settlements, equipment costs, and travel to deployment locations. The advance is designed to eliminate the financial gap that forces capable auditors to stop — covering the 12 to 24 months that typically separate a documented violation from a settlement check.
The advance is recovered first from settlement proceeds. The funding entity then takes a negotiated percentage of the remaining net. You keep what is left. The exact percentages are negotiated and documented before the advance is made — no ambiguity, no surprises when the check arrives. The structure is transparent from day one.
Nothing. You owe nothing to the funding entity. The performance-only structure means the funding entity's return depends entirely on a settlement being reached. If the case does not settle — for any reason — the funding entity absorbs the loss. This is the risk the funding entity accepts in exchange for its percentage of the proceeds when cases do settle.
No. You apply as an auditor. The funding entity and its attorney capital partners handle the legal and investment structure. Your role is to document violations cleanly and professionally. When a case moves toward filing, the funding entity coordinates with civil rights attorneys who take the case on contingency — your documented violations are the evidence they need to say yes.
If you want to understand your rights more deeply before your next deployment, Be My Own Attorney provides preparation tools for First Amendment auditors specifically.
Legal notice: Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice or creates an attorney-client relationship. The funding model described here requires qualified legal counsel to implement. If you are facing criminal charges related to auditing activity, consult a licensed criminal defense attorney. This site is a public information resource.